Hillary's Legacy

ray a · August 2007

From Townhall.com....

[i]Washington, DC – September 11, 2012 – Today, President Hillary Clinton received the following joint communiqué from the leadership of Al Qaida, Hezbollah, and Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez: “Because your policies so easily allowed us to reconstitute our powers and infiltrate your pathetically porous borders, we have hidden three nuclear weapons in three major American cities. If you try to find them, we will set them off. If you do not give in to our demand, we will set them off. Our demand? That you surrender your nation to us or suffer the loss of millions of Americans. There will be no negotiation.”

Washington, DC – September 12, 2012 – Today, President Hillary Clinton surrendered the United States of America to terrorists.[/i]

How's the writer's crystal ball? Fact or fiction?

Paul in Cannon Beach · August 2007

I think there are lots of factual reasons to be concerned about a "President Hillary" that its not necessary to speculate about a hypothetical situation.

Hillary is certainly smart and often effective. What bothers me is the constant feeling I get that she is pretending to be one of us.

And by one of us, I mean one of us humans.

ray a · August 2007

The factual reasons make the conjecture plausible, therefore we need to be take this seriously.

allsteaks · August 2007

Why does the author date the prediction 2012? It likely won't take that long. It's also a concern that she would react to aggression with nuclear weapons rather than a foot soldier war. Then again, maybe I'm not giving her a fair chance to prove herself; oh yeah, she already has by being co-president.

ritaanz · August 2007

Cut it out you guys!

allsteaks · August 2007

Rita!! where have you been? We've missed you.
Ain't politics grand?

NaeNae55 · August 2007

And here I just commented on another post that without Paul we wouldn't have anyone to stir the pot. I totally forgot about Ray. x:o What was I thinking? :-S

ritaanz · August 2007

Ray knows just how to get me to respond.

What is scary is that when witch hill ran for the NY Senate, everyone said she would lose big time. Now look what happened.

ray a · August 2007

Yes, she brought in a huge government contract to a local electronics manufacturer. x:P

ritaanz · August 2007

I truly believe she made a deal with the devil.

allsteaks · August 2007

Hillary chooses to identify herself as a Progressive rather than a Liberal, from the 1920's government movement. It was the beginning of American Socialism: break up the big companies because they are bad for the country and are too powerful, bigger government, share the wealth, tax the rich back to poordom, your government is in control and will take care of everything.
It is a good tag for her to wear.

joannie · August 2007

"share the wealth, tax the rich back to poordom"

Isn't that the true democrat's position? "As long as it is somebody else's wealth. Don't touch mine."

NeedCoffee · August 2007

Hee hee. So true.

Paul in Cannon Beach · August 2007

Where are the Democrats, atheists and Californians on this board?

Its no fun if we all agree.

plynnl · August 2007

Here. We just listen.

ritaanz · August 2007

Why? We would like to get another view point of Hill and etc.

ray a · August 2007

Speak up plynnl, all of us except Ritaanz will be kind to you.

ritaanz · August 2007

Thanks Ray.

Paul in Cannon Beach · August 2007

So, Plynnl, if the election were today, who would you vote for?

I have a follow up. What would be your "dream ticket"?

p.s. Your profile says you are in Vancouver, Washington. Neighbor!!!

plynnl · August 2007

I will probably be hung up to dry, but I was always leery of the present administration even from the start. It is now bordering on pure contempt and we need a change.

I am doing some research, and I don't have a dream ticket yet. I do like Obama and I am not total against Hilary, just now sure how she would do in the general election.

If a Republican candidate piqued my interest, I would have no problem voting for him/her.

Yes Paul, I am a neighbor, but apparently from the "liberal" metropolitan area. I do love Cannon Beach and all the surrounding beach areas.

Paul in Cannon Beach · August 2007

I dont think you are alone in your dissapointment with the current administration.

Right now, I am giving Romney a close look. I think Guiliani is interesting but I am not convinced he has what it takes on a national scale.

Obama is in over his head. Thats my opinion. In some ways, I would prefer Hillary over Obama.

Whatever party the next president is from, I pray he or she is a problem solver and good communicator.

ray a · August 2007

Plynnl, you say you aren't totally against Hillary, that implies you do have problems with her. What are your concerns, other than not sure how she'd do in the general election?

plynnl · August 2007

My problem with her is not necessarily with her politics although I consider her more conservative than some of the other democratic canditates. The problem is how she is perceived by some voters in this country and how that will transulate into how she is perceived by foreign governments expecially when our reputation has been severely damaged as it is.

Elizabetharess · August 2007

Don't like her. Won't vote for her if she is the dem. rep. I can't vote republican either so what's a person to do?????

allsteaks · August 2007

Ralph Nader? Very scary, but hopefully a lot of unhappy Dems will vote for him, splitting the vote again. This is difficult to admit, but the more the Dem candidates talk, the more it's clear that Hillary isn't the worst, at least in my view. Edwards and Osama/Obama are going off the charts trying to please the farthest left. And Obama's military strategy is really, REALLY scary!!

ray a · August 2007

I firmly believed a couple months ago that the next presidential election was the Democrat's to lose. I thought it would be a cakewalk for them because of the backlash to Bush. But, at this point, if the Repubs nominate a middle of the road candidate with a wide appeal that is *not-Bush*, then they just may win it. The leading Democrats are just too divisive, Especially Hillary.

Paul in Cannon Beach · August 2007

Barak Obama's wife Michelle has repeatedly said in speeches "If you can't manage your own household, how can you manage the white house?"

Question: Is that a swipe at Hillary?

Hillary's Legacy

Comments